|
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
Letter to the Editor:
Petroleum drycleaners and cleanup funds
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
To the Editor
I am responding to the letter
published in the April 2005 issue of the National Clothesline. Justice in economics is
a noble concept written of (among other places) in Leviticus
over a thousand years ago. There seems to be as much confusion
about it now as two millennia ago.
A gentleman from South Carolina has been
getting the word out about his unhappiness with his
states’ drycleaner remediation plan. He seems to believe
that it was put in place to change drycleaners’
behaviors. This is not the case. The program’s primary
goal is to identify and clean up drycleaning job sites.
With this as a goal, it is necessary to
raise funds. Economics is the social science about people
responding to incentives, and when South Carolina set up its
fund, in an attempt to tax equitably, they taxed only perc
users. Perc users responded as rational businessmen — by
switching to other solvents and becoming more efficient with
their solvent use.
The fund immediately began
underperforming as drycleaners altered their behavior. By the
time the fund could respond (by attaching sales tax) the damage
was done. Poor compliance and collections had become too
common.
Now the fund has begun correcting its
initial problem, by taxing all new cleaners. No one is being
forced into the fund; he can open a dry store and continue his
avoidance of these taxes.
Also, I question the assurance he feels
from an insurance policy. Almost all policies have exclusion
for pre-existing problems, and it’s likely that the
incentive to find a problem as pre-existing will affect any
claim’s outcome.
South Carolina’s biggest cleanup
project is a case where the owner was spraying the weeds with
perc; there is a lesson for all of us in this. This practice,
today obviously wrong, was acceptable at one time and we cannot
know what regulations will come to us in the future. Chemical
responsibility is not a problem for the few; and I don’t
believe in two types of drycleaners separated by solvent type.
Tom Grant
Tom’s Cleaners
Plano,Texas
tomwithtoms@verizon.net
Better than discounts
To the Editor
Many drycleaners are frustrated with the
need to match the 10 to 30 percent discounts offered by the
competition across the street. Such discounts cut into
already-thin profits.
And what about customer loyalty? Even
with exceptional service quality, losing customers remains an
issue. How can drycleaners keep customers loyal?
The top three airlines alone have more
than 30 million consumers on their frequent flier rolls. By
participating in value added programs like frequent flier
miles, drycleaners can attract new customers and earn
additional loyalty without engaging in heavy discounting.
Other established added value programs
include contributions to local schools (eScrip — three
million consumers), charities (Tricordia — one million
consumers) and college savings accounts (Upromise — six
million consumers).
Most large industries use frequent flier
miles and other added value programs (such as those listed
above) to acquire large pools of new consumers and win their
loyalty. While some drycleaners use time-tested programs like
frequent flier miles, most do not.
Why do only a handful of dry cleaners
offer added value programs like frequent flier miles? The first
factor is the administrative cost. The tracking of qualified
purchases and paying out the benefits is burdensome to both
counter staff and administrative staff.
Second, frequent flier programs have
minimum purchase quantities that are too high for mom-and-pops
to manage (e.g. you must purchase a minimum of 50,000 miles to
buy Delta miles). Consumers typically want to be able to earn
miles under more than one airline program, so the minimum
purchase quantities can be even more burdensome.
Registered card programs that
automatically provide rewards to only those consumers who want
the reward have become a popular mechanism for administering
and distributing added value. With these programs, everything
happens behind the scenes as member consumers make credit card
purchases — there is no administrative burden to the
drycleaner. The administrators of these programs purchase
multiple added value awards, in bulk and discounted rates, on
behalf of the merchant participants.
For example, Idine (now called Rewards
Network) is a program that sends 27 million registered
cardholders and frequent flier members to tens of thousands of
participating restaurants and hotels. It took time for the
drycleaning industry to catch on, but now such programs are
being made available to the drycleaning industry.
National added value programs can
increase the loyalty of consumers because they leverage brand
names that are highly recognizable to consumers. Consumers
become more loyal because they see the same logos (and similar
rewards) at a variety of participating merchants as they make
everyday purchases.
The Upromise Dry Cleaning program, for
example, directs its 6 million members to make purchases only
at those merchants that provide a 3 percent contribution to the
members’ college savings accounts. Drycleaners pay the
contribution (and associated administrative fees) on qualified
purchases made by Upromise members that have registered a
credit card with the program.
Don’t discount simply for the sake
of countering the competition’s discounts. Provide added
value services that consumers appreciate. Discounts become
ingrained over time and customers come to expect them from both
you and your competition. Added value programs are unique and
provide higher consumer loyalty at a fraction of the cost of
traditional discounting.
Marc Ellis, Managing Partner
Signature Channels, LLC
marc@signaturechannels.com
|
|
|||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||