|
|
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Labor law in the new administration
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
It is so much easier to take an extreme position when you have no power to act
on it. The Employee Free Choice Act may be a victim of this rule of power and
politics.
Before the election of Barack Obama, Democratic legislators favoring this
pro-union amendment to the National Labor Relations Act could count on
Republicans to filibuster it or President Bush to veto it. That is no longer
the case.
While it is popular to bash business, regardless of political affiliation,
business is what makes this country function. Politicians are now concerned
that supporting labor on the extreme EFCA could result in businesses being
hurt, and consequently, cause businesses to stop making political contributions
to politicians who support it.
My concern, however, is not what Congress can do. My concern is related to all
the vacancies on the federal courts that will be filled by Obama and approved
by the new Congress.
For more than a year, Congress has blocked President Bush from making numerous
appointments to the federal courts, and except for the Supreme Court, there are
plenty of vacancies to be filled.
More liberal judges
For example, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal, which has traditionally been a
conservative court right below the Supreme Court covering cases in Maryland,
North and South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia, has more vacancies than
any court in the land. It is entirely possible that the Court — filled with Obama appointees — will become even more liberal than the Ninth Circuit, which is headquartered in
San Francisco, and is the most reversed federal court in the country.
President Obama will undoubtedly appoint judges who are more inclined to favor
employees over businesses. They will certainly be more likely to interpret laws
more favorably to those employees than their employers. That’s because no matter how fair a judge thinks he or she is, he cannot help but
bring his biases and prejudices to the job.
I have been a management labor lawyer for over 30 years. I see things from
management’s perspective. I know that employer’s strive to keep good, hardworking employees regardless of their race, sex, age,
and so forth, but there are plenty of lawyers who have spent years fighting
management who believe, sincerely, that this is not the case. Those people will
be appointed judges in 2009, not me.
Agency appointments
President Obama will also appoint people to OSHA, the Department of Labor, the
Environmental Protection Agency and other agencies who view themselves as
pro-employee or pro-environment.
As a result, they will be less friendly to business, and their agencies will
issue regulations that will make it more difficult to run your business and
make a profit. Regulations can cause even more mischief than the statutes
passed by Congress.
In other words, the people making the rules and the people interpreting them
will not be the ones who ran businesses, borrowed money to keep their
businesses afloat, or had to deal with employees in their pre-governmental
careers who seemed committed to getting fired from the minute they were hired.
Instead, they will be people who worked for government agencies, unions, or
other organizations who believe the word “corporation” is evil and that businesspeople have no soul. It will be difficult for
businesses to get a fair hearing because the biases and prejudices of those
decision makers will not allow that to happen.
The most disturbing aspect of the last election to me was the demonization of
business and successful people. If this attitude carries over to courts and
agencies, we may long for the good old days when businesses were merely
disliked.
It will become more critical in 2009 to hire only the best employees, and to
monitor your employment practices, to insure that you stay out of court and
avoid charges of discrimination. The climate will be less friendly, if it was
ever really friendly at all. Even if no labor law is changed during the Obama
administration, business may be in for rough times in labor and employment
cases.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
