|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
National Clothesline
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
How cutting labor increased costs
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A few months ago, I was working with a production manager in the Midwest. There
was an urgent need to cut labor at this plant.
Everyone was in agreement — the owner, the general manager, as well as my student, the production manager.
Mission accomplished, I thought, but what happened the next day was
extraordinarily peculiar. On this last day, I gave the manager carte blanche to
use everything that he’s learned and to make his own mistakes and to make the successes of the day his
own.
In an attempt to cut labor, the manager actually increased labor! Is it polite
or politically correct to say that he made a very stupid mistake? When I think
about what he did, I can hardly believe it. When I think about sharing it with
you in this column, I fear that you’ll read it and either think that I am making this up or that you recognize what
was done as something that you’ve done and you realize that I have, in a roundabout way, just called you
stupid!
I am walking on thin ice here, but I believe that if just one person benefits
from this, it will be well worth this risk.
This is so important to discuss during these days of declining piece counts
because cutting labor is of paramount importance. But if one attempts it and it
proves futile, then you can easily become gun-shy. Then you leave your labor
cost where it is and miss the opportunity to save lots of money.
The entire business world revolves around your cost per piece. Or at least your
labor cost per piece. Ninety-nine out of one-hundred drycleaners couldn’t tell you either one, but I am going to help you with that, not by telling you
what your cost is (only you can do that), but by showing you how to tell when
it goes up and
Forget about how much you pay somebody. Forget about how much you pay a
particular person. Come up with a math formula called Pieces Per Labor Hour
(PPLH). You’ve probably heard me talk about this before.
The way to cut labor at this particular plant — and this happens to be true at many plants — is to attain and retain maximum productivity and make sure that all of the
non-pressing personnel finish work promptly when the pressers finish.
That is how we cut labor at this plant during the first three days. We had three
pressers pressing a total of 95 pieces per hour.
In addition, we had a drycleaner/spotter and two people in the inspection arena
to do assembly and bagging. That is a total of six employees in order to
produce, from start to finish, 95 pieces of drycleaning. This is 15.8 PPLH.
Very respectable.
So what did the manager do? He saw that there were only about 100 pieces left to
press, so he sent two of the pressers home. This evidently sounded like
substantial labor savings to him because there were two fewer people to pay.
The fact is, the labor cost went up, and it went up HUGE! Would you believe it
doubled?
It took the remaining presser three hours to press 100 pieces. The drycleaner
hung around to do post-spotting, and (believe it or not) two people remained in
the inspection/assembly area. The presser was only pressing 33 pieces per hour
and there were four people on staff! PPLH: 8.25.
In case you’re interested (or haven’t fainted yet) the cost per piece for labor (assuming an average hourly rate of
$10) skyrocketed to $1.20 from $.60. It’s no wonder that drycleaners are guy-shy and skeptical about cutting labor.
Perhaps they have tried it in the past and it didn’t work out in their favor.
As I was in the process of writing this column, I shared this story with another
client. I told him what this manager did. When I said, “He thought that he cut labor because there were two fewer people to pay,” I got a very interesting reaction. He believed that there was labor savings
here, too. He was, in fact, stunned at the point that I was making and simply
dying to get an explanation.
It’s really quite simple, but it seems to be a revelation to some people, maybe
many.
The chart at right labeled “Shirts” is from a PPLH monitoring spreadsheet that I custom-design for Tailwind System
clients. (At this time, this sheet is only available to Tailwind Systems users
because the typical goals set on the sheet are not attainable without Tailwind
for Drycleaning or the Tailwind Shirt System. If there is enough interest, I
may reconsider this policy).
This is the only way to learn how to monitor labor to make sure that you don’t accidentally increase labor while, at the same exact time, fully believe that
you are cutting labor.
The importance of understanding this is most important. It can save your life
and save your business. I cannot stress this enough. The next two graphics
labeled “Drycleaning” display the example that I described earlier. Remember the manager that sent
two pressers home because there wasn’t that much work?
You know what I tell you, month after month…
"If you do what you always did, you'll get what you always got!"
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
