|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
National Clothesline
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Good for gossip, bad for employers
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
When I first started practicing law in 1977, secretaries and lawyers were
allowed to smoke anywhere in the building, including at their desks.
In 1977, we still used carbon paper, some lawyers dictated letters to
secretaries who took shorthand, and we did not even have fax machines.
Today, we have laser printers, computers, and email.
In 1977, the law against sexual harassment was in its infancy. It was acceptable
to tell a female employee that she looked good, people hooked up in the
workplace all the time, and some workplace “touching” was not considered problematic.
Boy, have times changed.
Every conscientious employer has a policy against sexual harassment, which
encourages employees to report instances of inappropriate behavior. That
behavior can include comments, jokes, emails, persistent requests for dates,
and other actions that could have innocent explanations or merely reflect a
lack of good taste.
Many companies do not allow employees to date, which can be awkward when the
boss gets an invitation to the wedding.
I am writing about sexual harassment because I just read a case about a group of
doctors being sued for creating a hostile environment for their female
employees. As far as I can tell, none of the doctors engaged in demands for
sexual favors, but their bad taste was good enough to get them embroiled in a
lawsuit that a federal court ruled recently would go to trial.
Basically, the three male doctors are alleged to have acted like frat boys
toward their female employees. Specifically, one employee testified that when
she made hospital rounds with one of the doctors, he would tell her to be sure
to perform sex acts on the male patients. She also said the doctor would
undress in front of her, insisting that she stay so they could continue to
discuss patients.
His response to any protests was, allegedly: “Stop being a girl.”
Another doctor, according to all the female employees who brought suit, liked to
talk about the women with whom he had had sex. Supposedly, he kept photos of
naked woman on his phone (probably an iPhone, if they were good quality), which
he insisted on sharing with them. They also said that this second doctor would
tell them to wear shorter skirts or show more cleavage.
The third doctor is alleged to have told them to “loosen up” and have sex. When one of the female employees lost weight, the third doctor
ostensibly asked her if “lots of sex” was part of her exercise regimen.
With the possible exception of the striptease allegation, most of these
comments, taken alone, would not create a hostile environment. The number of
comments, which did not stop after there were complaints, made the real
difference in the court’s view of the propriety of the comments.
I recommend to my clients, first, that they maintain a professional working
atmosphere at all times. They should stop both male and female employees from
turning the workplace into an episode of “Two and a Half Men,” where every comment has an element of bad taste. It is very easy for “consensual” banter to be turned into hostile banter, either by an employee taking the
banter too far or an employee deciding that he or she can use the comments to
allege, after being disciplined, that he or she was the victim of sexual
harassment.
I also recommend to my clients that whenever an employee asks another employee,
supervisor, or UPS delivery person to stop making comments, that they take them
seriously and put a stop to them. Unless the complaints are so clearly off the
wall that taking action would be inappropriate, some effort should be taken to
correct the situation. Why take the chance later that some judge will think
that the complaint required a response?
If you are the boss, you must be especially careful of what you say to your
employees. Vulgar language should be avoided; sexual comments should be kept to
a minimum. If people do not laugh at your jokes, take the hint. If they laugh
reluctantly, use good judgment in deciding whether your sense of humor is good
or bad.
Do not touch your employees except when touching is clearly expected (for
example, if they start to fall and you catch them). If an employee gives you a
hug, take it, but keep it short. No matter how tense an employee says she is,
an offer to rub her shoulders is never the right response.
I have seen plenty of employers have to fire senior employees for inappropriate
comments in the workplace or at after-hours gatherings. They have no choice in
today’s legal environment but to take action against such supervisors, and in some
cases, it is just plainly the right thing to do.
It’s never a bad idea to remind employees that workplace comments of a sexual
nature are inappropriate. If you do, maybe you can avoid a lawsuit like the
hapless doctors in Western Pennsylvania. Sexual harassment cases are good for
gossiping, but for the employer who has to defend one, there are no benefits.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
