|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
National Clothesline
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
More government in store in 2013
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
In 2013, we will probably find out if the president can make “recess” appointments to the National Labor Relations Board when the Senate is not
technically in recess.
This is important, as I have mentioned in past columns, because the NLRB wants
to intrude more aggressively into non-union workplaces, and the members leading
this charge are recess appointments.
The NLRB, to reiterate, has adopted a
Also on the union front, Michigan in December became the 24th right-to-work
state, despite the high percentage of union households in that state. In a
right-to-work state, employees cannot be required to join a union to keep their
jobs. This hurts unions by reducing the number of dues paying members, namely,
workers who have elected not to join. President Obama has already chimed in
against the right-to-work laws.
With the NLRB under attack in the courts, and the unions under attack in the
legislatures, 2013 will be an interesting year on the future of unions in the
private sector. I suspect that the number of government employees being
unionized will continue to go up in states where public employee unions make
large contributions to elect the people with whom they will be negotiating. One
of the reasons for the increase in union representation in the public sector is
this alliance between politicians and the unions in the form of political
contributions.
This year will also be the first year of Obamacare. If you are large enough, you
are covered. For the most part, if you already provide health insurance
benefits to your employees, you will notice no difference (except higher
premiums). If you do not, you need to ask your accountant if you are covered
and what your options are. You may choose to pay the penalty rather than
provide the insurance.
I also expect the discrimination laws to continue to be expanded to the point
where only lawyers will have a chance of understanding them. Disability
discrimination lawsuits will rise, especially as people go to the doctor more
often as a result of Obamacare.
The definition of “disability” changed not too long ago, and now almost every malady — with the right lawyer — can be turned into a disability.
The issue of mental disability will also probably be refined in 2013. There were
several cases decided in 2012 dealing with employees who engaged in bizarre
behavior in the workplace. The employer concluded, with good reason, that they
were “crazy.”
Unfortunately, recognizing that an employee is crazy may be recognizing that he
or she has a mental disability that must be accommodated. In the past, when an
employee did or said something anti-social, you could comfortably use that
behavior to justify discipline, including termination.
Based on a few cases decided last year, employers may have to rethink
disciplinary decisions based on behavior that could be evidence of a mental
disorder. It appears that sociopaths have the same rights as older workers,
women, and other protected classifications.
OSHA will, in 2013, continue its anti-employer stance. In December, a high
ranking Department of Labor official addressed a gathering of union officials
and asked for their help in lobbying Congress to beef up workplace safety laws.
The principal Congressman pushing for OSHA reform (and by reform, I mean more
power) retired, and the Department of Labor is looking to fill the void. Expect
more regulations, where the DOL does not need the help of Congress.
I am sure that there will be other developments in 2013 in health, labor,
employment, and safety that no one could have predicted. When they happen, I
will address them in future columns. Happy New Year.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
